The Obama administration's housing plan, set to be rolled out Wednesday, will have to reckon with a little-understood fact underlying current efforts to slow foreclosures: More than half of mortgage modifications have left borrowers with the same or higher loan payments.
While modifications are designed to keep owners in their houses, by the time they are worked out, borrowers often are well behind on their loans. Lenders often add these past-due amounts -- which can include principal, interest, taxes and insurance -- driving monthly payments higher. At the same time, lenders have been reluctant to reduce principal even for borrowers who owe far more than their homes are worth.
Higher loan payments may make sense in limited cases, but they increase the likelihood of the modification failing, critics say. "If you restructure a loan so that people pay the same or pay more, it's probably not going to work," said Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller.
Thirty-eight percent of recent loan modifications resulted in increased payments for borrowers, according to an analysis by Alan M. White, a professor at Valparaiso University School of Law in Indiana, while 13% resulted in no change to payments. The study looked at more than 23,000 modifications between Dec. 26, 2008, and Jan. 25, 2009, involving subprime mortgages and Alt-A loans that were packaged into securities.
Mortgage servicers try to structure payments so they are affordable to borrowers, said Jay Brinkmann, chief economist of the Mortgage Bankers Association. Where payments rise as a result of modifications, he says, the increases are often modest.
There are some signs mortgage companies are becoming more aggressive when helping troubled borrowers. Twelve percent of recent loan modifications included some forgiveness of principal, interest and fees, according to Prof. White, compared with 10% in November and 2% between July 2007 and June 2008.
For complete article by Ruth Simon of the Wall Street Journal click here
Recent Comments